Application of Motivational Enhancement Therapy in Group settings among Patients with Substance Abuse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29120/ijpsw.2019.v10.i1.105Abstract
Background: Substance abuse is defined as the use of a drug or any other substance for a non-medical purpose with the aim of producing some type of "mind-altering "effect in the users. Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) is a systematic intervention approach for evoking change. It is based on principles of motivational psychology and is designed to produce rapid and internal motivation. Aims: The present study aims to assess and compare desire to quit substance use among substance users and the effectiveness of Motivation Enhancement Therapy on the desire to quit substance use in an experimental group. Sample and Sampling: A total number of 70 participants were selected using purposive sampling technique. The sample comprised of 35 from inpatient unit and 35 from the out-patient department of psychiatry, Kalpana Chawla Government Medical College and Hospital, Karnal, Haryana, India. Results and Conclusions: The present study suggests that comprehensive patient-friendly treatments are more effective in increasing the desire to quit substance use than the standard pharmacological treatment. Hence, combining pharmacological treatment with appropriate psychosocial interventions focusing on the specific problem of the patient may provide a better outcome than either one alone. Clinicians can arrange the clinical teaching regarding MET for a larger group at whole including family interventions.
Keywords: Motivation enhancement therapy, substance abuse
References
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2001: Management of substance abuse. World Health Organization; 2009.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Berglund M, Thelander S, Jonsson E. Treating alcohol and drug abuse. An evidenced-based review. Weinheim (DE): Wiley–VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA; 2003.
Miller WR, Wilbourne P, Hetema JE. What works? A summary of alcohol treatment outcome research. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches effective alternatives. 3rd ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2003;13-63.
UKATT Research Team. The effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised alcohol treatment trial (UKATT). BMJ 2005;331-41.
Gordon L, Graves N, Hawkes A. A review of the cost-effectiveness of face-to-face behavioural interventions for smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol. Chronic Illn 2007;3:101-29.
Marinelli-Casey PJ, Domier C, Rawson RA. The gap between research and practice in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:984-87.
Najavits LM, Crits-Christoph P, Dierberger B. Clinicians’ impact on the quality of substance use treatment. Subst Use Misuse 2000;35:2161-90.
Australian Institute of Primary Care. Comorbidity treatment service model evaluation. Victoria (AU): Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University; 2009.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1986.
Proude E, Lopatko O, Lintzeris N. The treatment of alcohol problems: a review of the evidence. Sydney (AU): Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2009.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Guildford Press; 2002
Miller W, Rolnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 1991.
Miller W. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 1983;11:141-72.
Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Frankforter TL, Van Horn D, Crits-Cristoph, Carroll KM. Site matters: Multisite randomized trial of motivational enhancement therapy in community drug abuse clinics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2007;75:556-67
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization; 1993.
Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1996;10:81-9.
Di Clemente CC, Hughes JR. Stages of change profiles in outpatient alcoholism treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse. 1990;2:217-5.
Bien T, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction. 1993; 88(3):315-6.
DiClemente C. Prochaska J. Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change. In Miller, W. and Heather, N. (eds), Treating Addictive Behaviours. Plenum Press: New York; 1998.
Dahl HM. Drug Abuse and Change Readiness in Prisoners: Effect of Motivational Interviewing as measured by SOCRATES. University of Tromso: Norway; 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Kuldeep Singh, Prashant Srivastava, Savita Chahal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.