Eudaimonia in Action: Leisure in the Lives of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities

Authors

  • Febna Reheem S Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
  • Lekshmi V Nair Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29120/jds.v12i2.803

Abstract

Leisure is a domain in life that allows for rest, relaxation, development and engagement of the individual. Drawing on a phenomenological study among persons with intellectual disabilities in Kerala, the paper explores the nature of their leisure experiences. The findings reveal that leisure for the participants is not a discrete activity or time slot but a deeply embedded, relational, and purposive aspect of everyday life. By drawing on the narratives and leisure routines of the participants, the paper argues that participants’ leisure experiences are characterized by meaning-making, emotional connection, and the pursuit of self-affirmation, even within constraint.

Keywords: Intellectual disability, leisure, eudaimonia, participative research

References

Aitchison, C. (2003). From leisure and disability to disability leisure: Developing data, definitions and discourses. Disability & Society, 18(7), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000127353

Best, S. (2010). Leisure studies: Themes and perspectives. SAGE Publications.

Buttimer, J., & Tierney, E. (2005). Patterns of leisure participation among adolescents with a mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629505049726

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Darcy, S., & Dowse, L. (2013). In search of a level playing field – the constraints and benefits of sport participation for people with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 28(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.714258

Dumazedier, J. (1974). Sociology of leisure. Elsevier.

Kaplan, M. (1975). Leisure: Theory and policy. Wiley.

Karr, K., & Lashua, B. (2004). Leisure and pleasure: Identity and late-modern consumer culture. Leisure Studies, 23(4), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261436042000231653

Kelly, J. R. (2000). Changing issues in leisure: Implications for wellness. Society and Leisure, 23(2), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2000.10715597

Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007

Mannell, R. C., & Kleiber, D. A. (1997). A social psychology of leisure. Venture Publishing.

Mobily, K. E. (1989). Meaningful activity and life satisfaction: Selected theoretical and empirical issues. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 23(3), 47–56.

Molden, T., & Tøssebro, J. (2009). Disability and participation in the digital society: A comparative analysis of leisure activities. Disability & Society, 24(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802652426

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.

Odegård, A. (2009). Participation in occupation and everyday activities among adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686649

Parr, M., & Lashua, B. (2010). What is leisure? A conceptual review. Leisure Studies, 29(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614361003716927

Raisborough, J. (2007). Lifestyle media and the formation of the self. In S. Casey, N. Casey, & J. Kelly (Eds.), Leisure lives: Intersections of leisure and life. Routledge.

Reynolds, F. (2002). Symbolic aspects of coping with chronic illness through textile arts. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 29(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4556(02)00140-8

Rogers, N. B., Hawkins, B. A., & Eklund, S. J. (1998). The leisure experience of older adults with developmental disabilities: A qualitative study. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1998.11949801

Roulstone, A., & Barnes, C. (2005). Working futures? Disabled people, policy and social inclusion. Policy Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Shaw, S. M. (1985). The meaning of leisure in everyday life. Leisure Sciences, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408509512103

Solish, A., Perry, A., & Minnes, P. (2010). Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00525.x

Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678003300203

Stebbins, R. A. (2007). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. Transaction Publishers.

Veal, A. J., & Lynch, R. (2002). Australian leisure. Longman.

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678

Wilensky, H. L. (1960). Work, careers, and social integration. International Social Science Journal, 12(4), 543–560.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Reheem, F., & Nair, L. V. (2026). Eudaimonia in Action: Leisure in the Lives of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Disability Studies, 12(2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.29120/jds.v12i2.803

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers